+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 15 12311 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 144
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,684
    Thanks
    387
    Thanked
    663
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts

    Default Judge orders 15 yo statutory rape victim to pay child support...

    http://www.dispatch.com/content/stor...1_T0B1RSR.html

    .By Mary Beth LaneThe Columbus Dispatch Saturday August 16, 2008 7:50 AM


    ShareThis


    LANCASTER, Ohio --- A Pickerington couple and their son are fighting for custody of a baby born to a Lancaster woman charged with having unlawful sex with the boy, who was 15 at the time of conception.
    A paternity test shows that the teen is the father of the baby born April 7 to Jane C. Crane, who was 19 when she became pregnant. Now, a judge has ordered him to pay $50 a month in child support and set visitation at seven hours a week.
    Crane, meanwhile, faces criminal charges. A Fairfield County grand jury indicted her last month on two counts of unlawful sexual conduct with a minor, a fourth-degree felony. Conviction carries a maximum sentence of 18 months in prison and a requirement to register as a sex offender for 25 years.
    Crane is living with the baby and her family in Lancaster.
    The boy's parents say they can provide a better upbringing for the baby than Crane can. Her household includes her stepfather, David L. Jacobs, who was convicted of domestic violence last year for hitting, choking and pointing a gun at Crane's 17-year-old sister and was placed on two years' probation, court records show.
    "We don't want to have our granddaughter abused by these people," the boy's father said. "We are trying to do the right thing.
    "The child support was the icing on the cake. I couldn't believe that our son has to pay child support to his abuser."
    The Dispatch does not identify victims of sexual abuse.
    Crane is scheduled for a pretrial conference before Common Pleas Judge Richard E. Berens on Aug. 21. A hearing and a status conference in the custody dispute are scheduled for next month before Domestic Relations Judge Kathy S. Mowry.
    Crane, now 21, is not a suitable custodial parent in part because she may have committed a felony by having sexual intercourse with a minor younger than 16, the boy's parents argue in court papers seeking custody.
    Crane declined to comment. She is free on a $5,000 recognizance bond pending trial. Her attorney, Sandra Davis, did not return calls. Lawyer Jennifer Strunk, the court-appointed guardian ad litem representing the baby's interests, said through a spokesman that she could not comment.
    That a 19-year-old woman had sex with a 15-year-old boy might seem like no big deal to some, but it is a serious charge, said Assistant Prosecutor Julia Dillon.
    It makes no difference that it is an adult female charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor boy rather than the more common instance of an adult male charged with unlawful sexual conduct with a minor girl.
    "It is an age and maturity issue, not a gender issue," Dillon said. "He's a young boy coming into his own, being taken advantage of by an adult."
    There could yet be a plea agreement. "I have made what I consider to be a reasonable offer, but I have not received a response," she said.
    The incident has had lasting affects on the boy, now 16, his mother said.
    "He has nightmares, he is stressed out," she said. "He is a father, even though it was a crime for him to be a father. His life is changed forever."
    Crane got to know the family while she worked at a local movie theater with the boy's older sister. When Crane said that her stepfather was abusive, his family allowed her to move in with them.
    The boy's sister later bought her own home and Crane moved in with her. It was there last summer that Crane had sex with their son at least twice, his parents said.
    mlane@dispatch.com


    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5,078
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked
    427
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Wow.
    It's clear he is the victim of sexual assault and should not be forced to pay child support for his child. He and his parents have every right to fight for custody of his daughter and granddaughter.
    What would people think if it was reverse genders and the young girl who had been raped and her rapist was not only raising her child and in an abusive environment but she was expected to pay child support. I know that scenario wouldn't happen....

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Home, where my life lies waiting, silently, for me.
    Posts
    8,990
    Thanks
    3,308
    Thanked
    1,659
    Reviews
    11
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    i think its disgusting that he pay child support when he was deemed to have been raped by this woman!

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to trishalishous For This Useful Post:

    fairyflossfairy  (09-04-2012)

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    The tropics...
    Posts
    700
    Thanks
    76
    Thanked
    202
    Reviews
    4
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    I may get roasted for this but I think there may be more to this story. The story is saying it was statutory rape - if I hazard to guess I would say the two were in a consensual relationship, she got pregnant and the boys parents found out, were unhappy so they had her charged for sex with a minor.

    Realistically he could have been 15 and 11 months and she could have been just 19. That is, in essence, only three years difference. I have known quite a few males and females in consensual relationships with that age difference at that age, except the male was older.

  6. The Following 12 Users Say Thank You to nerdgirl99 For This Useful Post:

    BabyG4  (10-04-2012),CazHazKidz  (10-04-2012),EchoSummers  (09-04-2012),Eko  (09-04-2012),emzluvbub  (10-04-2012),FiveInTheBed  (09-04-2012),Izy  (10-04-2012),nelle7250  (10-04-2012),starflame  (09-04-2012),VicPark  (09-04-2012),Von Zipper  (09-04-2012),wilding  (08-04-2012)

  7. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    4,765
    Thanks
    1,903
    Thanked
    2,790
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    How terrible all round...

    If the genders were reversed the 15 year old would be faced with becoming a parent which would cost a lot more than $50 a month... Just a thought.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to shelle65 For This Useful Post:

    Izy  (10-04-2012)

  9. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    2,995
    Thanks
    1,382
    Thanked
    2,879
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nerdgirl99 View Post
    I may get roasted for this but I think there may be more to this story. The story is saying it was statutory rape - if I hazard to guess I would say the two were in a consensual relationship, she got pregnant and the boys parents found out, were unhappy so they had her charged for sex with a minor.

    Realistically he could have been 15 and 11 months and she could have been just 19. That is, in essence, only three years difference. I have known quite a few males and females in consensual relationships with that age difference at that age, except the male was older.
    You know, I agree with this.

  10. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,684
    Thanks
    387
    Thanked
    663
    Reviews
    0
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    But the law states that the 15 year old can not legally consent to sex with the 19 year old, so legally it can't be consensual. Regardless of if I agree with that law, the fifteen yr old is not - by law - considered adult enough to understand what they are consenting to when engaging in sex, so how can they be held accountable for paying child support. Has me baffled.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to bada For This Useful Post:

    Deserama  (09-04-2012)

  12. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    452
    Thanks
    74
    Thanked
    50
    Reviews
    1
    My husband was 14 when his 16 year old girlfriend fell pregnant and 15 when his daughter was born. He's paid child support since miss 10 was born and is a major part of her life. His encounter was consensual (it was a one off and his first time!) and since he made the decision to act like a grown up he has stepped up to his grown up responsibilities. A 15 year old knows what they are doing. My PERSONAL opinion is even though the law says consensual sex is 16 it doesn't mean males younger than that don't know what they are doing and I think it may have been the parents that had a lot to do with the statutory rape claim. Ask ANY 14 15 or 16 year old about being with an older woman and they will tell you it's cool. I'm pretty sure in this case it's what's happened and the parents just don't wanna see there angel as having grown up and are trying to place blame elsewhere.

  13. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    The tropics...
    Posts
    700
    Thanks
    76
    Thanked
    202
    Reviews
    4
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by bada View Post
    But the law states that the 15 year old can not legally consent to sex with the 19 year old, so legally it can't be consensual. Regardless of if I agree with that law, the fifteen yr old is not - by law - considered adult enough to understand what they are consenting to when engaging in sex, so how can they be held accountable for paying child support. Has me baffled.
    Perhaps the ruling was made to ensure the 15/16 year old was being held accountable for his actions (that is - consensual and unprotected sex). The law is the law - it was statutory rape. However I have no doubt that a 15-year-old knows that sex can equal a baby. My guess is that the judge saw that the relationship and resulting baby were consensual in nature and decided the child (baby) should not suffer financially as a result.

    Again, I am making a lot of assumptions here. But the story doesn't seem black and white to me.

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to nerdgirl99 For This Useful Post:

    CazHazKidz  (10-04-2012)

  15. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    5,078
    Thanks
    83
    Thanked
    427
    Reviews
    1
    Achievements:Topaz Star - 500 postsAmber Star - 2,000 postsAmethyst Star - 5,000 posts
    Quote Originally Posted by nerdgirl99 View Post
    I may get roasted for this but I think there may be more to this story. The story is saying it was statutory rape - if I hazard to guess I would say the two were in a consensual relationship, she got pregnant and the boys parents found out, were unhappy so they had her charged for sex with a minor.

    Realistically he could have been 15 and 11 months and she could have been just 19. That is, in essence, only three years difference. I have known quite a few males and females in consensual relationships with that age difference at that age, except the male was older.
    The age of consent in many states in the USA is 18


 

Similar Threads

  1. Judge orders mum to cut daughter's hair
    By LoveHeart in forum Pregnancy & Parenting In The News
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 14-07-2012, 12:07
  2. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 27-02-2012, 16:21
  3. Victim Blaming - an analogy **mentions rape**
    By WorkingClassMum in forum Social Issues
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 22-02-2012, 19:57

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
free weekly newsletters | sign up now!
who are these people who write great posts? meet our hubbub authors!
Learn how you can contribute to the hubbub!

reviews
learn how you can become a reviewer!

competitions

forum - chatting now
christmas gift guidesee all Red Stocking
Softmats
With so many amazing reversible designs, the soft and cushioned Premium Bubba Mats are the perfect space for all the family. Not only do they look fantastic; you can also enjoy the quality and comfort for years to come.
sales & new stuffsee all
Wendys Music School Melbourne
Wondering about Music Lessons? FREE 30 minute ASSESSMENT. Find out if your child is ready! Piano from age 3 years & Guitar, Singing, Drums, Violin from age 5. Lessons available for all ages. 35+ years experience. Structured program.
Use referral 'bubhub' when booking
featured supporter
KindyROO
KindyROO offers activities for babies & toddlers in a fun learning centre, focussing on developmental education. Classes are available at three Brisbane and two Gold Coast locations. Enrol today & help your child to reach their full potential. Visit the website to find out more.
gotcha
X

Pregnant for the first-time?

Not sure where to start? We can help!

Our Insider Programs for pregnancy first-timers will lead you step-by-step through the 14 Pregnancy Must Dos!