Some people need more to worry about (all BF photo threads merged)

[Mister Noodle]

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/07/27/nur....ap/index.html

Words fail me.

[tickle]

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," wrote Lauren, a mother of a 4-month-old.

What the? These people have issues.

[FourAngelKisses]

"I was SHOCKED to see a giant breast on the cover of your magazine," one person wrote

I wonder if they get offended when they see cow udders on the front of a farming magazine??

Some people need to get over it and realise that a breast is just a piece of skin that a baby uses to feed with, not a sexual object.

[Chickadee]

I'm not surprised at all that many Americans reacted that way. And don't forget, people are always more likely to write complaints than letters of praise, and the complaints are more likely to make the news. So the reaction that is being reported is automatically skewed to the negative.

[Areca]

I've seen this article popping up all over the internet.

I wonder if these people that think that picture is disgusting think the same of the covers of playboy magazine's.

Really all you can do is feel sorry for the people offended by that picture....what kind of cr*ppy a$%e world do they live in?

[tickle]

Yes Martha, very true. I just find it rather strange that people even think that way!

[Pippi Longstocking]

Well, I can understand why it was offensive. I can't believe they had that on the front cover!

















A real live child! *shakes head, looks appalled*

[SilverStarfish]

I'm with you, Mr Noodle...

For god's sake, its a BOOB!! GET OVER IT!!!

[KarniF00l]

Oh know it's a boob *covers eyes*

[KarniF00l]

"Gross, I am sick of seeing a baby attached to a boob," wrote Lauren, a mother of a 4-month-old.

I thought i should add that i'm a different Lauren before ppl start asking