Why the double standard?
Regardless of the details of each procedure, why do some people respect a Jewish parent's choice to circumcise their infant son, yet the same people condemn a Muslim parent's choice to circumcise (FGC) their infant daughter?
Why the double standard?
Regardless of the details of each procedure, why do some people respect a Jewish parent's choice to circumcise their infant son, yet the same people condemn a Muslim parent's choice to circumcise (FGC) their infant daughter?
Last edited by bada; 10-09-2009 at 23:08.
Because you can't do such things to girls, that would be horrific.
I have no idea why.![]()
I can't go to bed, someone is wrong on the internet.
My guess is that 10 years from now, there will be threads on BH (if it's still around lol) saying "I can't believe they used to circumcise boys, and not that long ago either!" but that's still another decade of boys being circ'd. We say that now about the female equivalent, yet in the past it probably was something that wasn't really thought of too much, it just was.
I would really like to know too, but from the other thread it appears the people who are defending their right to RIC because of religion, are not game to answer the question about girls...
please somebody who believes in RIC for boys respond!!
Now we are six: DH, Me, DD1, DD2, DS1 & DS2.
I believe it is because society wants to "*protect" women more than it does men.
So it has not become a totally unacceptable, unnecessary procedure.
*Protect could easily be replaced with a more accurate word.
Still ttc
Monkey, killing monkey, killing monkey
Over pieces of the ground.
Silly monkeys give them thumbs,They make a club
And beat their brother down.
Are you for real? Male circumcision is a quick snip snip. Female circumcision is body modification. How can you even say regardless of the procedure? That is what makes it so different. Too add, it is not only infants. It can be girls up until the age of 15.
For the record, it is not only the jewish that circumcise boys. My husband is circumsized, and he isn't jewish.
Last edited by xkwzit; 14-09-2009 at 14:07. Reason: language
there are a number of types of female circumcision. some more damaging than male circ, some less damaging, and one type exactly the same.
all are illegal on a girl, even a symbolic pin prick.
as it can be for boys. - irrelevantt is not only infants. It can be girls up until the age of 15.
btw, male circ is mutilation too
Last edited by xkwzit; 14-09-2009 at 14:07. Reason: quoted post had been edited
btw, male circ is body mutilation too[/QUOTE]
Just as a matter of interest, and please don't feel obliged to answer if you find this too personal, but what specifically makes you feel that strongly? I assume that this was done to you when you were too young to consent, correct me if I'm wrong. Since this is a concern of mine in case my child feels like this if we go ahead, I just wanted to know.DH had it done as a child and he's perfectly happy. I do wonder if reading a lot of anti articles etc have made you feel like missing out and on what aspects specifically.
Last edited by xkwzit; 14-09-2009 at 14:08. Reason: quoted post has been edited
From what I understood female circ can be damaging & cause loss of feeling in the area ie you'd be unable to enjoy sex as much. (Please correct me if I'm wrong) Male circ does not cause the same kind of problems. I think that's the difference. By the way DP, his father, my father & all his brothers had it done & none of them are unhappy about it.(none of them are Jewish either)
MeDH
DS (3)
Bookmarks