watermelon
07-01-2006, 22:27
Hi everyone,
I have just weaned DD from BM to formula after weeks of terrible BF issues and a steady decline in her weight. It seems that at 5 months old she just refused to take the breast anymore and nothing could entice her back, so I had to quickly swap to formula. I tried a couple of samples and settled on the Nan1 HA Gold cause it seemed to dissolve more easily and bub just seemed to like it. She started putting on weight again at about 100grams per week so I was pretty happy.
I went to the CHN last Friday for our monthly visit and she was a fill in nurse due to the Xmas holidays so she had no idea of what I had been going through trying to get DD to feed. I told her that we were back on track and I was using the Nan1 HA Gold now. The CHN told me that this formula is basically "no good" because the proteins are hydrolyzed (chopped up smaller) and that babies need the complete proteins for growth and development. I said that I thought that gold formulas were supposed to be superior due to the fatty acids and that is why I chose it. In addition this formula is marketed as "easy to digest" because it is hydrolyzed. I thought that would be beneficial seeing I had just swapped from BM. We have had no problems on this formula, no constipation or vomiting so I am reluctant to change. We are due to swap to a follow on formula in a couple of weeks and I was going to go to the Nan 2 HA gold but now I'm a bit confused.
Has anyone else heard negative things about HA formula? I've read a few posts that say this formula was recommended by Dr's and CHNs???
Another thing this CNH told me was that I must feed my baby Farex in addition to veggies and fruits. (We started solids at 4 months due to the BF issues). Apparently, only Farex can provide the recommeded daily intake of iron.
DD is not too keen on it even when I mix it in with her other food so do I persist in offering it to her and have her reject most of her solids?
:confused:
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!
Sam
Mum to Sophie 20/7/05
I have just weaned DD from BM to formula after weeks of terrible BF issues and a steady decline in her weight. It seems that at 5 months old she just refused to take the breast anymore and nothing could entice her back, so I had to quickly swap to formula. I tried a couple of samples and settled on the Nan1 HA Gold cause it seemed to dissolve more easily and bub just seemed to like it. She started putting on weight again at about 100grams per week so I was pretty happy.
I went to the CHN last Friday for our monthly visit and she was a fill in nurse due to the Xmas holidays so she had no idea of what I had been going through trying to get DD to feed. I told her that we were back on track and I was using the Nan1 HA Gold now. The CHN told me that this formula is basically "no good" because the proteins are hydrolyzed (chopped up smaller) and that babies need the complete proteins for growth and development. I said that I thought that gold formulas were supposed to be superior due to the fatty acids and that is why I chose it. In addition this formula is marketed as "easy to digest" because it is hydrolyzed. I thought that would be beneficial seeing I had just swapped from BM. We have had no problems on this formula, no constipation or vomiting so I am reluctant to change. We are due to swap to a follow on formula in a couple of weeks and I was going to go to the Nan 2 HA gold but now I'm a bit confused.
Has anyone else heard negative things about HA formula? I've read a few posts that say this formula was recommended by Dr's and CHNs???
Another thing this CNH told me was that I must feed my baby Farex in addition to veggies and fruits. (We started solids at 4 months due to the BF issues). Apparently, only Farex can provide the recommeded daily intake of iron.
DD is not too keen on it even when I mix it in with her other food so do I persist in offering it to her and have her reject most of her solids?
:confused:
Any opinions would be greatly appreciated!
Sam
Mum to Sophie 20/7/05