DoulaFelicity
14-12-2005, 15:07
I am writing this post as an outraged woman, Mother, Doula, and birth activist, in regards to the impending closure of the Family Birth Centre of the Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne (with the Hospital planning to "streamline" their birthing women into "low risk" and "high risk", all in the labour ward). I birthed my son under the care of a wonderful, unobtrusive, supportive midwife in the FBC, and enjoyed an intervention free triumphant labour (I'm one of the fortunate 5% of women who birth in Hospital without intervention).
Whilst a Hospital Birth Centre is still intrinsically a Hospital environment, and there are some similarities between the FBC and the labour ward, the differences are vast, and it is those differences that set apart the FBC from the labour ward and necessitate its ongoing existence. It is what the FBC represents, and what it is a stepping stone towards (in terms of societal acceptance of normal birth and midwifery care based in evidence) that matters - and that is damaged severely by this closure. The statistics, research and evidence overwhelmingly support Birth Centre care for normal ("low risk" ) pregnancy and birth; yet this highly popular, healthy and successful option is now being removed from women's reach, due to factors that allegedly include "cost ineffectiveness" (which has got to lead to serious concerns in respect to ethical conflict of interest; when a low intervention facility is closed because the Hospital is not making enough money from it, does this mean the Hospital makes more money from intervening in birth? A logical conclusion can only be yes, that is exactly what this closure means. And what does this mean for the health and wellbeing of those women and babies who are receiving these profitable, but medically unnecessary, interventions?).
Having personally spoken to a midwife who was involved in the grassroots movement in 1979 which resulted in the establishment of this very popular and successful Birth Centre (after much blood, sweat, and tears), the first of its kind in Melbourne, the true horror and deep loss that its closure would signify is apparent to me. What a gigantic leap backwards in Maternity services!
Every well informed birthing woman and birth professional will feel the brunt of this blow to woman centered care.
The planned closure of the FBC is a travesty against informed choice and birthing options for women. Birthing women, above all else, want choice in their models of care. They want (and deserve) access to a diverse range of care during their pregnancy and birth. Evidence supports Birth Centre care as being the better, safer choice for "low risk" pregnancy and birth. How, then, can removing this option from the greater public arena possibly be justified?
It is essential that the Family Birth Centre at the Royal Women's Hospital Victoria remain open, functional, and accessible to the wide range of birthing women who have benefited in the past from it and those who stand to benefit from it in the future.
You can write to:
The RWH Foundation Executive Director, Wendy Brooks: wendy.brooks@rwh.org.au
The Labour Health Minister, Bronwyn Pike: bronwyn.pike@parliament.vic.gov.au
The Liberal Health Minister, David Davis: libs@vic.liberal.org.au
The Age: newsdesk@theage.com.au
The Herald Sun: Newsdesk: news@heraldsun.com.au Letters to Ed: hsletters@heraldsun.com.au
Edited to correct a contact for correspondence.
Whilst a Hospital Birth Centre is still intrinsically a Hospital environment, and there are some similarities between the FBC and the labour ward, the differences are vast, and it is those differences that set apart the FBC from the labour ward and necessitate its ongoing existence. It is what the FBC represents, and what it is a stepping stone towards (in terms of societal acceptance of normal birth and midwifery care based in evidence) that matters - and that is damaged severely by this closure. The statistics, research and evidence overwhelmingly support Birth Centre care for normal ("low risk" ) pregnancy and birth; yet this highly popular, healthy and successful option is now being removed from women's reach, due to factors that allegedly include "cost ineffectiveness" (which has got to lead to serious concerns in respect to ethical conflict of interest; when a low intervention facility is closed because the Hospital is not making enough money from it, does this mean the Hospital makes more money from intervening in birth? A logical conclusion can only be yes, that is exactly what this closure means. And what does this mean for the health and wellbeing of those women and babies who are receiving these profitable, but medically unnecessary, interventions?).
Having personally spoken to a midwife who was involved in the grassroots movement in 1979 which resulted in the establishment of this very popular and successful Birth Centre (after much blood, sweat, and tears), the first of its kind in Melbourne, the true horror and deep loss that its closure would signify is apparent to me. What a gigantic leap backwards in Maternity services!
Every well informed birthing woman and birth professional will feel the brunt of this blow to woman centered care.
The planned closure of the FBC is a travesty against informed choice and birthing options for women. Birthing women, above all else, want choice in their models of care. They want (and deserve) access to a diverse range of care during their pregnancy and birth. Evidence supports Birth Centre care as being the better, safer choice for "low risk" pregnancy and birth. How, then, can removing this option from the greater public arena possibly be justified?
It is essential that the Family Birth Centre at the Royal Women's Hospital Victoria remain open, functional, and accessible to the wide range of birthing women who have benefited in the past from it and those who stand to benefit from it in the future.
You can write to:
The RWH Foundation Executive Director, Wendy Brooks: wendy.brooks@rwh.org.au
The Labour Health Minister, Bronwyn Pike: bronwyn.pike@parliament.vic.gov.au
The Liberal Health Minister, David Davis: libs@vic.liberal.org.au
The Age: newsdesk@theage.com.au
The Herald Sun: Newsdesk: news@heraldsun.com.au Letters to Ed: hsletters@heraldsun.com.au
Edited to correct a contact for correspondence.