SassyMummy
22-09-2006, 00:24
Just reading back over the VBAC pages (there are only SIX of them, in all of BubHub's history! :eek: )...and I found a link to http://www.hencigoer.com/articles/vbac/
The site isn't particularly interesting, but there is one paragraph which I think makes a very valid point:
Is it reasonable for hospitals to refuse VBAC based on the argument that they don't have the staff or equipment to deal with potential emergencies? Again, the answer is "no." Emergencies occur in non-VBAC labors, and there are other situations that increase the chances of needing an emergency cesarean where hospitals don't make special exceptions such as induction of labor and epidural analgesia. If a hospital isn't safe for a VBAC labor, it isn't safe for any woman to labor there.
He makes a very good point - and one for you all to keep in mind whenever someone starts to argue that point with you.
Just thought I'd share.
The site isn't particularly interesting, but there is one paragraph which I think makes a very valid point:
Is it reasonable for hospitals to refuse VBAC based on the argument that they don't have the staff or equipment to deal with potential emergencies? Again, the answer is "no." Emergencies occur in non-VBAC labors, and there are other situations that increase the chances of needing an emergency cesarean where hospitals don't make special exceptions such as induction of labor and epidural analgesia. If a hospital isn't safe for a VBAC labor, it isn't safe for any woman to labor there.
He makes a very good point - and one for you all to keep in mind whenever someone starts to argue that point with you.
Just thought I'd share.