Sansouyu
08-07-2009, 13:27
Hi, what do others think about neglectful/abusive parents being able to have visits with their children over webcam?
This is the situation I am in. For a more detailed picture, my daughter was taken into care and protection by DoCS earlier this year after the second subsequent hospitalisation in as many months, both hospitalisations involved broken bones and extensive bruising, while with my Ex. The latter hospitalisation had bone breaks described by the surgeon as requiring the force of a car accident. There was no explanation by my Ex for any of these injuries other than 'she hit herself with her bottle' and 'one time the pram tipped over'.
Once daughter was taken into care and protection the department gave me full time care. Once this started the caseworker wanted me to start webcam contact, I told her I didn't want to, she persisted for a week and I ended up giving in with a 'see how it goes'.
It hasn't been easy being the supervisor and parent during these sessions. My Ex has a history of intimidation, threats and always has to be in control. The only reason its a history is that the case is still in the courts and everything Ex says is being scrutinized. Ex feels safe enough to boss me around during these sessions, which I try to ignore, but I don't see why I should have to put up with it anyway? Things that effect me effect my daughter, its unavoidable. Additionally, my daughter, being 2 years old, holds little interest in webcam sessions (which frusteration Ex to no end).
I got fed up a couple of weeks ago and skipped a couple of sessions, which was followed up by the caseworker calling me and stating that 'If you don't persist with the sessions Ex can apply to the courts to get the webcam sessions court ordered'.
I feel like the caseworker has lost touch.
What does everyone think about webcam sessions for abusive/neglectful parents? Should the other parent who was not involved in the abuse/neglect be responsible for the organising and monitoring the sessions? If there was webcam visitation service offered similar to the current supervised visit method would this make it more acceptable?
Thanks.
This is the situation I am in. For a more detailed picture, my daughter was taken into care and protection by DoCS earlier this year after the second subsequent hospitalisation in as many months, both hospitalisations involved broken bones and extensive bruising, while with my Ex. The latter hospitalisation had bone breaks described by the surgeon as requiring the force of a car accident. There was no explanation by my Ex for any of these injuries other than 'she hit herself with her bottle' and 'one time the pram tipped over'.
Once daughter was taken into care and protection the department gave me full time care. Once this started the caseworker wanted me to start webcam contact, I told her I didn't want to, she persisted for a week and I ended up giving in with a 'see how it goes'.
It hasn't been easy being the supervisor and parent during these sessions. My Ex has a history of intimidation, threats and always has to be in control. The only reason its a history is that the case is still in the courts and everything Ex says is being scrutinized. Ex feels safe enough to boss me around during these sessions, which I try to ignore, but I don't see why I should have to put up with it anyway? Things that effect me effect my daughter, its unavoidable. Additionally, my daughter, being 2 years old, holds little interest in webcam sessions (which frusteration Ex to no end).
I got fed up a couple of weeks ago and skipped a couple of sessions, which was followed up by the caseworker calling me and stating that 'If you don't persist with the sessions Ex can apply to the courts to get the webcam sessions court ordered'.
I feel like the caseworker has lost touch.
What does everyone think about webcam sessions for abusive/neglectful parents? Should the other parent who was not involved in the abuse/neglect be responsible for the organising and monitoring the sessions? If there was webcam visitation service offered similar to the current supervised visit method would this make it more acceptable?
Thanks.