PDA

View Full Version : Size difference between bummi's pul covers and baby beehinds?



peainapod
20-03-2009, 20:51
Hi

I am expecting my first baby in August, and have scored myself a huge stash of secondhand baby beehind fitteds. Only thing is there aren't many covers.

I was thinking about making them myself, but I noticed a seller on ebay is selling packs of 6 covers for $38 incl post. Bargain!

Feedback others have given says they're similar to bummi's covers, and the seller is also selling bummi's covers.
So, I'm wondering are bummi's a comparable quality? How does sizing equate?

Thanks!

Rachel

Mamalicious
20-03-2009, 20:56
I have both, and I really prefer Baby Beehinds.

The PUL is much softer, and I like the sizing better, seems to last longer. :yes: And the elastic doesn't leave marks. :thumbsup:

cloudgirl
21-03-2009, 20:41
i am expecting first baby in May and have been told that Bummis and Thirsties covers are better for Newborns as they 'fit better' than the BBHs - (i have all three brands and intend trying this out)
although i suppose it depends of whether you are using fitteds or prefolds? I am intending on using prefolds for main use at first but do have a good stash of fitteds which i spose dosent matter what cover i use.

Teegzie
22-03-2009, 22:57
I agree with Mamalicious, the BBH PUL is so much nicer, the elastic is more gentle and the velcro is good and strong and doesn't come undone in the wash resulting in a tangled mess of nappies and covers!