PDA

View Full Version : How breastfeeding transfers immunity to babies



AM
03-11-2008, 15:29
This is a really neat article :)

www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/10/081026101713.htm


How Breastfeeding Transfers Immunity To Babies
ScienceDaily (Oct. 27, 2008) — A BYU-Harvard-Stanford research team has identified a molecule that is key to mothers’ ability to pass along immunity to intestinal infections to their babies through breast milk.

The study highlights an amazing change that takes place in a mother’s body when she begins producing breast milk. For years before her pregnancy, cells that produce antibodies against intestinal infections travel around her circulatory system as if it were a highway and regularly take an “off-ramp” to her intestine. There they stand ready to defend against infections such as cholera or rotavirus. But once she begins lactating, some of these same antibody-producing cells suddenly begin taking a different “off-ramp,” so to speak, that leads to the mammary glands. That way, when her baby nurses, the antibodies go straight to his intestine and offer protection while he builds up his own immunity.

This is why previous studies have shown that formula-fed infants have twice the incidence of diarrheal illness as breast-fed infants.

Until now, scientists did not know how the mother’s body signaled the antibody-producing cells to take the different off-ramp. The new study identifies the molecule that gives them the green light.

“Everybody hears that breastfeeding is good for the baby,” said Eric Wilson, the Brigham Young University microbiologist who is the lead author on the study. “But why is it good? One of the reasons is that mothers’ milk carries protective antibodies which shield the newborn from infection, and this study demonstrates the molecular mechanisms used by the mother’s body to get these antibody-producing cells where they need to be.”

Understanding the role of the molecule, called CCR10, also has implications for potential future efforts to help mothers better protect their infants.

“This tells us that this molecule is extremely important, so if we want to design a vaccine for the mother so she could effectively pass protective antibodies to the child, it would be absolutely essential to induce high levels of CCR10,” said Wilson.

Speaking broadly about the long-term applications of this research, BYU undergraduate Elizabeth Nielsen Low, a co-author on the paper, said, “If we know how these cells migrate, we’ll be able to hit the right targets to get them to go where we want them.”

Daniel Campbell is a researcher at the Benroya Research Institute in Seattle, a nonprofit organization that specializes in the immune system, and was not affiliated with this study.

“The molecular basis for this redistribution [of the mother’s cells] has not been well characterized, but Dr. Wilson’s work has begun to crack that code and define the molecules responsible for this cellular redistribution and passive immunity,” Campbell said. “It is important work that fundamentally enhances our understanding of how immunity is provided to the [baby] via the milk. Dr. Wilson’s study will certainly form the basis for many other studies aimed at uncovering how the immune system is organized, particularly at mucosal surfaces.”

To conduct their research, the team used so-called “knock-out mice” that had been genetically engineered to lack the CCR10 molecule. Whereas normal lactating mice had hundreds of thousands of antibody-producing cells in their mammary glands, the BYU team found that the knock-out mice had more than 70 times fewer such cells. Tests verified that the absence of CCR10 was responsible for the deficiency.

Surprisingly, the research also showed that CCR10 does not play the same crucial role in signaling antibody-producing cells to migrate to the intestine. Another molecule is their “traffic light.”

The findings will be published in the Nov. 1 issue of the Journal of Immunology.

The study was supported by Wilson’s grant from the National Institutes of Health, funding which continues for another 18 months and supports his and his students’ further investigation into the cells behind transfer of immunity in breast milk.

Wilson’s other students who are also co-authors on the paper are Yuetching Law, Kathryn Distelhorst and Erica D. Hill. The Harvard Medical School co-authors are Olivier Morteau, Craig Gerard, Bao Lu, Sorina Ghiran and Miriam Rits. The Stanford University School of Medicine co-authors are Raymond Kwan, Nicole H. Lazarus and Eugene C. Butcher.

neostudded
03-11-2008, 16:32
Thanks :D
Breastfeeding is natures health plan :goodvibes:


Journal of epidemiology, 1997, reported that breast milk protects your baby against Hib for up to 10 years after lactation has ceased.

Research in developed and developing countries of the world, including middle-class populations in developed countries, provides strong evidence that human milk feeding decreases the incidence and/or severity of a wide range of infectious diseases, including bacterial meningitis, bacteremia, diarrhea, respiratory tract infections necrotizing enterocolitis, otitis media, urinary tract infection, and late onset sepsis in preterm infants.

In addition, post neonatal infant mortality rates in the United states are reduced by 21% in breastfed infants.


Anti-bodies have been found in breast milk to numerous illnesses, including tetanus, pertussis, diphtheria, polio, pneumonia, measles, mumps, rubella, smallpox, flu and echo viruses.

From "Breast Milk, A natural immunisation" Joanna Karpasea Jones.

Breastfeeding protects against all diseases currently vaccinated against, it is not something a lot of people know about. In fact, I was reading government information about vaccines, and I read "Vaccines are the only safe effective way of protecting your baby".

Well what about breastfeeding?
Why don't they mention it's protective factors?

I was talking to someone who said "because they don't want to make mothers who can't breastfeed feel bad". I disagree about that, I think they must have reasons that it is not mentioned.

I believe in the right to informed consent. Parents should have access to this information.

P.S It is a good book :thumbsup:

AM
03-11-2008, 16:42
I'll check that book out, it sounds right up my alley :)

neostudded
03-11-2008, 17:00
Oh another book you might like is "immunobiology of human milk", it was at mother's direct for 20 dollars down from 70 dollars!!

I just got my copy today, I will read it tonight.

JabberJaw
03-11-2008, 17:10
Thanks :D
Breastfeeding is natures health plan :goodvibes:





From "Breast Milk, A natural immunisation" Joanna Karpasea Jones.

Breastfeeding protects against all diseases currently vaccinated against, it is not something a lot of people know about. In fact, I was reading government information about vaccines, and I read "Vaccines are the only safe effective way of protecting your baby".

Well what about breastfeeding?
Why don't they mention it's protective factors?

I was talking to someone who said "because they don't want to make mothers who can't breastfeed feel bad". I disagree about that, I think they must have reasons that it is not mentioned.

I believe in the right to informed consent. Parents should have access to this information.

P.S It is a good book :thumbsup:


Mmmm obviously it must provide immunity for everything but chicken pox :confused: :confused: My bub had 2 doses in 5 weeks while fully breastfed, first being 6 spots and an all over rash, next being a bad case almost being hositalised.

Yes i agree to some extent that antibodies are passed over, but breastfed babies still get sick, and can still get vaxx preventable diseases. I have breastfed all my 4 children and believe it is benifical to both mother and child, but i honestly dont think it is a 'natural immuniser'. I believe it can help but is not always 100% effective.

It is good that they are doing further study into this though, the results will be interesting.

stellarella
03-11-2008, 17:20
Mmmm obviously it must provide immunity for everything but chicken pox :confused: :confused: My bub had 2 doses in 5 weeks while fully breastfed, first being 6 spots and an all over rash, next being a bad case almost being hositalised.

Yes i agree to some extent that antibodies are passed over, but breastfed babies still get sick, and can still get vaxx preventable diseases. I have breastfed all my 4 children and believe it is benifical to both mother and child, but i honestly dont think it is a 'natural immuniser'. I believe it can help but is not always 100% effective.

It is good that they are doing further study into this though, the results will be interesting.

Obviously BF babies still get sick. Just like vaccinated people still catch the illnesses they are vaccinated for.

No it's not 100% and neither is vaccination. Illnesses still "get through." Antibodies can only do so much, but it's still great to have them if it's through something as healthy and brilliant as BM, which has nothing but good side effects.

AM
03-11-2008, 17:21
Mmmm obviously it must provide immunity for everything but chicken pox :confused: :confused: My bub had 2 doses in 5 weeks while fully breastfed, first being 6 spots and an all over rash, next being a bad case almost being hositalised.

Yes i agree to some extent that antibodies are passed over, but breastfed babies still get sick, and can still get vaxx preventable diseases. I have breastfed all my 4 children and believe it is benifical to both mother and child, but i honestly dont think it is a 'natural immuniser'. I believe it can help but is not always 100% effective.

It is good that they are doing further study into this though, the results will be interesting.

No-one is debating the fact that the antibodies in breastmilk are not 100% effective, in fact no-one asserted that at all, and NOTHING is 100% effective. (as I'm sure you are well aware...)

Us breastfeeders love the fact that it is a natural BOOST to the immune system, we know breastmilk is good, but unfortunately, not quite THAT good ;)

neostudded
03-11-2008, 17:23
Yes, my son caught the flu and whooping cough (but he got that from a vaccine). It does not prevent your child from getting the illness/disease, nothing can.

But it offer's high long lasting protection to the baby. There are other risk factors which can weaken an immune system (antibiotics comes to mind).

It also makes it near on impossible for your baby to get certain things that can lead to cot death, email me if you would like a link.

neostudded
03-11-2008, 17:27
You know what I just realized? when my son got sick with influenza A, I had taken antibiotics to get rid of mastitis three days or so before. (I am almost certain).

So he was getting very poor immunity from my milk when he got sick.:doh:

bronny-jane
04-11-2008, 06:00
sure they still get sick, but ive noticed damon will give "the illness" to me, and i make anti bodies, and he gets them back through the milk, so no need for medication.. its great for him.. me however, ive never had so many little sick days before:laughing:... i dont mind though;)

Thermolicious
04-11-2008, 10:53
Just out of curiosity, what do you do when your child gets an infection? Connor had a chest infection a few weeks ago and I felt terrible giving him antibiotics, dosed him up on yummy yoghurt and probiotics but still felt really unsure about it all. Didn't finish the full perscription and it sort of came back but has since cleared up.

neostudded
04-11-2008, 13:57
When my son was 13 months, he got a chest infection. And I did not use antibiotics. I breastfed him a lot more and made sure he had lots of cuddles, etc, and it took two weeks for it to clear up.

I was very unsure about not giving him antibiotics, because I have grown up in a family where they are used a lot. And my mum kept telling me he would get brain damage from the fever, but he was okay.

And now I feel even more confident in our bodies ability to fight sickness.

Long story short, he did not get antibiotics and he got better, the temperature he had was good for his immune system.

I recommend you get the book "how to raise a healthy child, in spite of your doctor". It is a good book, even if it is a bit old.;)

Thermolicious
04-11-2008, 15:18
Thanks Neo! I will look that book up :)

jaydensmum
05-11-2008, 12:19
Wow, its very interesting in reading these facts. :yes:Thanks guys for posting it, its definetly given me more appreciation towards bf for my baby! :yes: